[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the GPL is a license not a contract ..
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .. |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:36:49 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/resources/feedback/OIIFB_GPL3_20040903.pdf
>
> Is the author of this incorrectly reasoned paper Rjack?
No. The author is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hoeren
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., (continued)
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Rjack, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract ..,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/11
Doogie, go to doctor and take mad Eben with you.. (was: Re: the GPL is a license not a contract ..), Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/11