Re: More FSF hypocrisy

[Rjack]

Thufir Hawat wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:22:19 -0400, Rjack wrote:
>
> > IF A COPYRIGHT LICENSE EXISTS, ITS LANGUAGE WILL BE INTERPRETED
> > AS A CONTRACT IN DETERMINING ITS COVENANTS FOR PURPOSES OF
> > BREACH AND THEN EXAMINED FOR LANGUAGE DETERMINING SCOPE FOR
> > PURPOSES OF INFRINGEMENT.
>
>
> Assuming this is so, what's your point?

The point of an original newsgroup post seems to evolvs with the
number of posts to the thread. I think we were discussing legal
enforcement of the GPL.

> All EULA would be contracts, yes?  Not complying with an EULA
> opens up a can of worms.

Depends on whether the EULA is ultimately found by the courts to be
enforceable or not.