Re: SFLC in frivolous mode again

[Hyman Rosen]

On 1/8/2010 5:39 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> The NYSD court seems to get fed up with SFLC practice
> of filing delay stipulations.
> "No further extensions for this, or any defendant in this action, will
> be granted. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/6/10) (cd)
> (Entered: 01/07/2010)"
>
> http://www.terekhov.de/09-cv-10155/19.pdf

I'm glad to see that your habit of posting documents which
directly contradict your thesis remains unchanged.

    plaintiffs and GCI ... hereby stipulate and agree that
    the time within which GCI may respond to the Complaint
    filed by the plaintiffs is hereby extended through and
    including March 8, 2010. ...
    (handwritten) No further extensions...

And the title of this document is
    STIPULATION AND ORDER
    EXTENDING TIME OF DEFENDANT
    GCI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
    TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

It is only in the bizarrely insane twists of your mind
that a one-time extension granted to the defendants could
be construed as criticism of the plaintiffs.