[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:48:13 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 2/10/2010 2:09 PM, RJack wrote:
"Posted On: September 7, 2009 by David Johnson
Good Copyright Registration "Hygiene" Necessary to Obtain Copyright
Protection over Revised Versions of Software"
http://www.digitalmedialawyerblog.com/2009/09/good_copyright_registration_hy_1.html
<http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2009/04/settlement-disagreement-leads-to.html>
Settlement disagreement leads to copyright ... claims
...
The court found that SG was entitled to an injunction against
copyright infringement. ... The injunction, however, would only
extend to the particular versions of the programs over which the
court had proper subject matter jurisdiction. The Second Circuit
doesn’t allow the kind of general prophylactic injunction that
other circuits do. (Query whether this rule will fall along with
the Second Circuit’s ruling rejecting the Tasini settlement, when
the Supreme Court does reverse.) SG’s remedy for other
infringements is to register the other versions.
Notice that last sentence. As usual, the links posted by the cranks
demonstrate against their theories.
Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/02/10
Re: Bye - Bye , open source derivative works litigation, RJack, 2010/02/10