Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled

[Alan Mackenzie]

RJack <user@example.net> wrote:
> Hyman Rosen wrote:

> I've told you a hundred times that the Jacobsen appeals court panel
> violated CAFC rules.

If you were correct, a single time would suffice.

Here's the *valid* opinion:

[ .... ]

Sorry, Rjack, by definition the opinion of that appeals court is the
valid one.

Why can't you simply admit you've been mistaken on this issue for quite a
long time?  No shame in that, even the lower court got it wrong to begin
with.

> Sincerely,
> RJack :)

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).