[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC is SOL
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC is SOL |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:08:26 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>>
>> > RJack wrote:
>> >>
>> >> RJack wrote:
>> >>
>> >> PACER:
>> >> SFLC just voluntarily dismissed GCI Technologies Corp.
>> >
>> > Uh, where is the SFLC's fucking press release triumphing yet another GPL
>> > 'settlement victory'?
>> >
>> > In the meantime
>> >
>> > http://www.cortex-pro.com/hdc_3000.php?t=3
>> >
>> > is still in breach.
>>
>> It would be rather unusual for a settlement not to entail reasonable
>> deadlines for enacting the settlement.
>
> LOL. And how much time that would take, silly dak?
See? You are already getting hysterical, as predicted.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: SFLC is SOL, (continued)
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
Re: SFLC is SOL, Rex Ballard, 2010/05/04