[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit
From: |
RonB |
Subject: |
Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:12:07 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) |
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:03:56 -0500, RJack wrote:
> Uhhhhhhhhhhhh. It's about the futility of the "licensed at no charge"
> anti-intellectual property GPL and the "ancillary services" business
> model built around it. That business model is about to collapse for some
> companies. SCO tries a business modeled around the GPL and collapsed.
No, they collapsed when they got away from the GPL business and tried to
sue former partners.
But don't let facts get in your way.
--
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581
CentOS 5.4 or Vector Linux Deluxe 6.0
- SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, 7, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, spike1, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, spike1, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit,
RonB <=
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, spike1, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, RJack, 2010/05/04
Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, RonB, 2010/05/04
Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04