Re: Significance of the GP licence.

[David Kastrup]

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> If she considers a breach ...
>
> She did NOT rule that there was a breach, you retard. She ruled quite
> the opposite:
>
> "With respect to the General Public License ("GPL"), MYSQL has
> not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the
> merits or irreparable harm."

You are confusing the decision about the preliminary injunction with the
ruling.  And you _did_ forget again what the discussion was about.  But
I admit that you did not use "moron" or "idiot" in your reply.

> *HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED*, YOU IDIOT.

Ah well, at least not in its first sentence.

-- 
David Kastrup