Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple

[Alexander Terekhov]

This is hilarious.

> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php
> 
> (in comments)

-----
What's the Latest in the Psystar Appeal? 

Authored by: hymie on Wednesday, July 28 2010 @ 12:53 PM EDT 

Sigh. I'm now annoyed with myself for once having contributed money 
to help support Groklaw. The notion of supporting restrictions on 
what one may do with legally purchased copies of software, EULAs 
notwithstanding, is about as far from the idea of software freedom 
as I can imagine. Making money is irrelevant. As had been endlessly 
explained, the GPL allows you to make money too. And first sale 
means that if you buy software, including GPLed software, you can 
resell it without being bound by its license. First sale is far too 
valuable a freedom to sacrifice, and that's what's being advocated 
here. 
-----

The GPL's girl reply:

-----
What's the Latest in the Psystar Appeal? 

Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, July 28 2010 @ 02:34 PM EDT 

Email me and I'll return every dime.

This isn't advocacy, by the way. I'm explaining
why I think this case, if Psystar wins, will be
used to destroy the GPL and all FOSS licenses.

Just so you know. 
-----

Sez Pee The-Ends-Justify-The-Means Jay.

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)