Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> companies copy and distribute BusyBox without honoring the GPL. 

True.

http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2010/08/10/may-they-make-me-superfluous.html

"Someday, I dream of opening up the <gpl@busybox.net> folder and 
having no new violation reports (BTW, those dreams usually become 
real-life nightmares, as I typically get two new violations reports 
each week). I also wish for the day that I don't have a backlogged 
queue of 200 or more GPL violations..."

So yes,

companies copy and distribute BusyBox without honoring the GPL. 

companies copy and distribute BusyBox without honoring the GPL. 

companies copy and distribute BusyBox without honoring the GPL. 

companies copy and distribute BusyBox without honoring the GPL. 

companies copy and distribute BusyBox without honoring the GPL. 

companies copy and distribute BusyBox without honoring the GPL. 

companies copy and distribute BusyBox without honoring the GPL. 

companies copy and distribute BusyBox without honoring the GPL. 

companies copy and distribute BusyBox without honoring the GPL. 

companies copy and distribute BusyBox without honoring the GPL. 

So what is your point silly Hyman?

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)