[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 9th Cir. License Primer
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: 9th Cir. License Primer |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:04:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> What rock have you been living under? The whole point of the GPL (as
>> opposed to, say, BSD style licenses) is that it is firmly rooted in
>> copyright ...
>
> In context, copyright means that the owner has exclusive right to
> copy in order to sell (permissions to make) copies verbatim and
> copies of derivative works of his work without interference from
> http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/freeloaders . . . In contrast, the
> GPL means . . .
a particular set of conditions under which the owner uses his exclusive
rights to grant certain permissions to selected recipients of copies of
his software.
> What rock have you been living under, silly dak?
Do you really not understand what a license is? After all this time?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, (continued)
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/24
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/29
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, jellybean stonerfish, 2011/03/29
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, David Kastrup, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, David Kastrup, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, Alexander Terekhov, 2011/03/30
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: 9th Cir. License Primer, RJack, 2011/03/30