[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Feb 2020 20:48:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 10:26:22AM -0800, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) wrote:
> On 2020-02-22 01:22, Andreas Enge wrote:
> > And another ad-hominem attack. Can you substantiate the claim of us
> > being
> > powermongers?
>
> https://wiki.gnu.tools/wiki:code-of-conduct
> "Enforcement", "Ban", "Correction", "Warning" ....
> You are sick.
Could I kindly ask for this person to be put on moderation? I find it
difficult to interpret the last statement as anything but a gratuitous insult
(following a message that was not even directed at them). Notice that there
is a pattern of overly aggressive messages by Kaz Kylheku.
If anything, this message shows how much a code of conduct is needed.
Thanks a lot,
Andreas
- Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alex Taylor, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Federico Leva (Nemo), 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/23