Re: [Gnucap-devel] patches to gnucap-2006-07-08

[Dan McMahill]

al davis wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 August 2006 17:20, Dan McMahill wrote:
>
> > patch-aa -- updates the version 
>
>
> ok .. needs to be updated every release, manually

yes.

> > and adds the missing man/html/Makefile 
>
>
> man/html is a generated directory, which can be deleted.  
> When it is deleted, man/html/Makefile.in is not regenerated.
> It is used only in building the dist file using autoconf-make,
> so I missed it.
>
> putting it back..

I guess I'd argue that while 99% of the contents of man/html is generate 
and can be delete, that the directory itself and the Makefile stuff 
shouldn't be deleted.


> > patch-ac -- adds missing man/html/Makefile.am.  This makes sure that the
> >             preformatted .html manual will show up in the .tar.gz
> >             distribution file so the end user won't be required to have
> >             latex and hevea installed just to be able to get the manual.
> >             It also installs the html manual as part of 'make install'
>
>
> man/html is a generated directory, so even Makefile.am must be a 
> generated file.  How to generate?  Copy from stash place?

but why ever totally remove the man/html directory?  Why not just remove 
all of the generated files in there?  Or does HeVeA have some issue with 
that?

> > patch-ad -- adds a new header file to the list of sources
>
>
> I missed it because the old build system separates .cc from .h files.
> Missing a .h file in Makefile.am seemed to have no visible symptoms,
> except in making a dist file.

If you make use of the mkid or etags/ctags functionality then that file 
will be missing there too.


> > patch-ae -- adds a couple of new test netlists which appeared
>
>
> Those files change often, and are always accessed by wildcard.
> Should the makefile use wildcard instead of explicit list?

Probably not a bad idea.


> > patch-ae -- adds a couple of new test outputs which appeared
>
>
> This is a generated directory.  It was luck that it was there at all.
> Copy from a stash place?

I'd probably rather see the directory not disappear but just most of the 
contents.

-Dan