[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP
From: |
Kevin Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Aug 2013 13:57:00 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130628 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
On 08/04/2013 10:10, al davis wrote:
> cmake-WIP should be based on "master", which changes slowly.
>
> Then when it is ready, it a simple matter to push it to master.
>
> It is not known now which of autotools-WIP or cmake-WIP will be
> ready first.
That's true, trying to keep everything sane wasn't fun. Given that this
is a WIP branch, is it alright if I just delete it and create a new one
based off 'master' instead?
> Whatever you base it on, you need to rebase when the base
> changes. If you base on something that is changing fast, you
> can go nuts doing that.
Linear history, got it. At first I tried rebasing but because the
autotools branch kept changing files from under me I decided to do a
merge. Oops.
Thanks,
Kevin Zheng
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, al davis, 2013/08/03
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP,
Kevin Zheng <=
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, Felix Salfelder, 2013/08/04
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, Kevin Zheng, 2013/08/04
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, al davis, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, Felix Salfelder, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, al davis, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, Felix Salfelder, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, al davis, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, Felix Salfelder, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, al davis, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, Felix Salfelder, 2013/08/05