[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[open-cobol-list] Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: open-cobol-0.9.6
From: |
Tim Josling |
Subject: |
[open-cobol-list] Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: open-cobol-0.9.6 |
Date: |
Fri Jun 14 03:40:02 2002 |
David Essex wrote:
>
> At 01:47 PM 13/06/02 +0900, Keisuke Nishida wrote:
>
> > At Wed, 12 Jun 2002 15:40:17 -0400, David Essex wrote:
> > ...
> >> In my view the above are relatively independent projects which could easily
> >> be shared between projects.
> > ...
> > Right. Should we start a new project, like cobol-utils, which
> > shares common utilities, libraries, and test suites?
>
> Sounds OK to me.
>
Sounds great to me.
I was intending to steal your runtime later on anyway so this makes it formal.
A few questions:
Licence? LGPL would be good.
Can we make the code
A) front-end agnostgic. No 'int display_number (struct tiny_cobol_number *
n);' types of things
B) ANSI C?
What coding standards would you propose, if any? I am used to gcc where they
are very fussy about fullstops on comments and all. Maybe that is over the top
but I do find it very useful to have a comment at top of file and before a
function saying what it is for.
I subscribe to tiny-cobol so no need to reply beyond there...
Tim Josling
- [open-cobol-list] Re: [Tiny-cobol-users] open-cobol-0.9.6, David Essex, 2002/06/12
- [open-cobol-list] Re: [Tiny-cobol-users] open-cobol-0.9.6, Keisuke Nishida, 2002/06/13
- [open-cobol-list] Re: open-cobol-0.9.6, David Essex, 2002/06/13
- [open-cobol-list] Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: open-cobol-0.9.6,
Tim Josling <=
- [open-cobol-list] COBOL utilities project (was: open-cobol-0.9.6), David Essex, 2002/06/14
- [open-cobol-list] Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] COBOL utilities project (was: open-cobol-0.9.6), Tim Josling, 2002/06/14
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] COBOL utilities project (was: open-cobol-0.9.6), David A. Cobb, 2002/06/14
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] COBOL utilities project(was: open-cobol-0.9.6), Tim Josling, 2002/06/14
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] COBOL utilities project(was: open-cobol-0.9.6), David A. Cobb, 2002/06/16
- [open-cobol-list] Re: COBOL utilities project, David Essex, 2002/06/14
- [open-cobol-list] RE: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: COBOL utilities project, vze3y7w8, 2002/06/14
- [open-cobol-list] Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: COBOL utilities project, Keisuke Nishida, 2002/06/15
- [open-cobol-list] RE: COBOL utilities project, David Essex, 2002/06/15
- [open-cobol-list] Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: COBOL utilities project, Tim Josling, 2002/06/14