[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [open-cobol-list] COBOL utilities project (was: open-cobol-0.9.6)
From: |
Keisuke Nishida |
Subject: |
Re: [open-cobol-list] COBOL utilities project (was: open-cobol-0.9.6) |
Date: |
Sat Jun 15 02:41:03 2002 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.6.0 (Twist And Shout) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (UnebigoryĆmae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:54:02 -0400,
David Essex wrote:
>
> > License? LGPL would be good.
>
> The programs could be released under the GPL and libraries under the LGPL.
I agree.
> > Can we make the code
> >
> > A) front-end agnostic.
> > No 'int display_number (struct tiny_cobol_number *n);' types of things
> > B) ANSI C?
It should be, in the same sense that DB or GMP is.
> > What coding standards would you propose, if any?
I prefer GNU's indent style, just because I have been used to it.
I do not care much about commenting, at least when the project is
evolving like now. Writing a readable code is more important than
having a comment, I think.
Keisuke
- [open-cobol-list] Re: COBOL utilities project, (continued)
- [open-cobol-list] Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: COBOL utilities project, Tim Josling, 2002/06/14
- [open-cobol-list] Re: [Tiny-cobol-users] Re: COBOL utilities project, Stephen Brownlow, 2002/06/16
- [open-cobol-list] NIST Test Suite, Keisuke Nishida, 2002/06/15
- [open-cobol-list] Re: NIST Test Suite, David Essex, 2002/06/15
- [open-cobol-list] Re: [Tiny-cobol-users] Re: NIST Test Suite, bgiroud, 2002/06/17
- [open-cobol-list] Re: [Tiny-cobol-users] Re: NIST Test Suite, Keisuke Nishida, 2002/06/17
- Re: [open-cobol-list] COBOL utilities project (was: open-cobol-0.9.6),
Keisuke Nishida <=
[open-cobol-list] Re: [Tiny-cobol-users] open-cobol-0.9.6, Bernard Giroud, 2002/06/15