Re: [open-cobol-list] gdb support from gcc-cobol

[Keisuke Nishida]

At Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:48:26 +0200,
Bernard Giroud wrote:
> 
> > > > struct elem_G
> > > > {
> > > >   unsigned char X[2];
> > > >   unsigned char Y[2];
> > > > };
(snip)
> I agree it is a little more complex, but it is much more
> natural. Another aspect: this is probably a point of
> divergence between OC and gcc-cobol (aka Gobol).

Maybe I am missing something, but is there any technical
advantage of having group items defined as structures?
Otherwise, I do not see the point of changing the current
design, which is sufficiently simple.

Keisuke