|
From: | Roger While |
Subject: | [open-cobol-list] Re: several problem issues with 0.32 |
Date: | Tue Jun 21 00:50:12 2005 |
1) Actually this is a "severe" warning. It is actually saying that NO code will be generated. Upcoming CVS will have FUNCTION's. I am of the opinion that, if something is not implemented, this should be an error. This will be so in a forthcoming CVS update for non-implemented code. 2) Known problem. Has been fixed in CVS. 3) There is a "Bugs" section. Firstly, check if the problem is reproducible using CVS version. Depends. I would do the following - Can I reproduce this with a small test program ? If so, put the program inline in the mail. If not, and the program (plus copy procs) is more than ca. 150-200 lines create an attachment; otherwise inline in the mail. Depending on where it blew up, you may have : a cobxxxxxx.cob (xxxxxx is random) in the /tmp or $TMP/$TMPDIR (if set) directory. Send/attach this. a prog.c and prog.c.h (prog = basename of cobol source) Send/attach these. P.S. Applies to everyone - Please refrain from sending signatures. I have no objection on private mails, but not on lists. Roger
I have several questions that may result in reporting bugs. 1. warning issue- running: cobc --std=mvs -Icopy -c file.cob -o file.o produces the following WARNING: file.cob: In paragraph '5050-CREATE-CBLOG': file.cob:299: warning: 'FUNCTION' not implementedif this is a warning AND i have not specified any warnings to be emitted thenwhy is this happening? 2. c output issues- running: cobc --std=mvs -Icopy -c file2.cob -o file2.o produces this: /tmp/cobNVeQ2m.c: In function `ML001_': /tmp/cobNVeQ2m.c:31: error: `f' undeclared (first use in this function)/tmp/cobNVeQ2m.c:31: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once/tmp/cobNVeQ2m.c:31: error: for each function it appears in.) /tmp/cobNVeQ2m.c:31: error: initializer element is not constant/tmp/cobNVeQ2m.c:31: error: (near initialization for `h_TSQ_FILE.record_size')3. cobc segmentation fault- i get a cobc segmentation fault compiling adifferent file. is there cobc make or configure options i can set to make certain that the most debugging info is available in the core dump? how do ireport this kind of error?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |