gnucobol-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?


From: David Essex
Subject: Re: [open-cobol-list] Which formatting convention to use?
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:48:26 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040618

Duke Normandin wrote:
David Essex wrote:
> ...
You can use what format you prefer.
The default is fixed format.
...
I was looking for educated opinions as to which would serve
> a noob best both now and in the long-term. ;)

Well if you looking for an opinion, I prefer the free format.

Why you ask ...

<rant>

The fixed format became the standard at the request of I*M.
The reason was that they wanted to be compatible with a punch card format dating back to the 18th century.

I can understand you have to deal with legacy issues, but the fixed format should have been an optional format, not the default. And it should have been declared obsolete when punch cards became obsolete, over 30+ years ago.

So 50+ years later, the fixed format is still the default.
All this to be compatible with a format, which most people working for I*M don't know or care about. And to be compatible with machines which can only be seen in museums.

Is it any wonder that COBOL courses has been dropped by CS departments all around the world.

</rant>

Anyway, my 2 cents worth.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]