[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [open-cobol-list] Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?
From: |
John Culleton |
Subject: |
Re: [open-cobol-list] Anybody use emacs to code COBOL? |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:42:27 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.10 |
On Friday 07 August 2009 12:20:17 pm Duke Normandin wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:01:52PM -0600, Duke Normandin wrote:
> > >> Actually THE (The Hessling Editor) is similar to Xedit, a
> > >> mainframe editor found on VM/CMS. The editor is similar to
> > >> the ISPF editor.
> > >>
> > >> If you are looking for a full ISPF environment (UN*X,
> > >> WIn32), you can find it here [1].
> >
> > I had some trouble getting syntax highlighting, and a few other
> > things, to work at first and almost gave up on it. But I
> > eventually got it to behave itself. It's syntax highlighting
> > even works well with c, python, etc., once I tweaked a few
> > color settings. I think I've finally found a favorite editor.
> > It's enough like ISPF where I feel right at home. The only
> > thing I haven't found yet is a syntax highlighting file for
> > e-mail.
>
> You're referring to THE I'm supposing, and not the "full ISPF
> environment"?
>
> > This editor discussion also inspired me to revisit a few other
> > editors I hadn't tried in a while. I'm using joe for this
> > e-mail. I've ended up spending most of the afternoon/evening
> > tinkering with editors. See what y'all started. :-)
>
> I like `joe' - it might just be super-configurable as well.
>
> > > I sure hope that I can compile it on my OS X box - looks too
> > > cool for words ;)
> >
> > May the source be with you. The only problem I had compiling
> > it on Linux was that I couldn't get the configure script to
> > believe the --without-x parameter. I had to end up installing
> > some gnome dev packages to make configure happy so I could get
> > it compiled. That wouldn't have been quite so annoying except
> > I don't use Gnome, I use DWM.
>
> My exact problem! I want to run it on a terminal, using `curses'.
> I'll have to fool around with the "configure" options.
Vim/Gvim comes with both command line and gui versions out of the
box. You say "vim" for a console session and "gvim" for a gui
version.
--
John Culleton
Create Book Covers with Scribus/e-book $5.95
http://www.booklocker.com/books/4055.html
Re: [open-cobol-list] Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?, Kevin Monceaux, 2009/08/06
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?, David Essex, 2009/08/06
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?, Duke Normandin, 2009/08/06
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?, Kevin Monceaux, 2009/08/07
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?, Duke Normandin, 2009/08/07
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?,
John Culleton <=
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?, Duke Normandin, 2009/08/07
Re: [open-cobol-list] Hybrid Editor XE(Was: Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?), Kevin Monceaux, 2009/08/07
Re: [open-cobol-list] Hybrid Editor XE(Was: Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?), Duke Normandin, 2009/08/07
Re: [open-cobol-list] Hybrid Editor XE(Was: Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?), Kevin Monceaux, 2009/08/07
Re: [open-cobol-list] Hybrid Editor XE(Was: Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?), Duke Normandin, 2009/08/07
Re: [open-cobol-list] Hybrid Editor XE(Was: Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?), David Essex, 2009/08/07
Re: [open-cobol-list] Anybody use emacs to code COBOL?, Ehud Karni, 2009/08/06