[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [open-cobol-list] Fixed vs Free Format
|
From: |
vince |
|
Subject: |
Re: [open-cobol-list] Fixed vs Free Format |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:59:20 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.33.7-server-2mnb; KDE/4.4.5; i686; ; ) |
Hi;
On Thursday 17 Nov 2011 20:42:24 Andrew Pennebaker wrote:
> Can -free be the default in future versions?
Why not, just compile OC so it is!
There again inserting ' >>source free' in each source file is not
exactly rocket science either
Vince
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andrew Pennebaker
> www.yellosoft.us
- [open-cobol-list] Fixed vs Free Format, Andrew Pennebaker, 2011/11/17
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Fixed vs Free Format, john Culleton, 2011/11/17
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Fixed vs Free Format, Andrew Pennebaker, 2011/11/17
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Fixed vs Free Format, vince, 2011/11/17
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Fixed vs Free Format, Brian Tiffin, 2011/11/17
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Fixed vs Free Format, john Culleton, 2011/11/17
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Fixed vs Free Format, Andrew Pennebaker, 2011/11/18
- Re: [open-cobol-list] Fixed vs Free Format, john Culleton, 2011/11/18
Re: [open-cobol-list] Fixed vs Free Format,
vince <=