[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [open-cobol-list] Undocumented cobc option: -static
|
From: |
J Martin Rushton |
|
Subject: |
Re: [open-cobol-list] Undocumented cobc option: -static |
|
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:13:01 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
If there are multiple instances of the code running at the same time,
then .so "shared objects", will be shared! Even if not shared, they
may already be cached. Two benefits flow: reduced physical memory
requirement and faster startup (cache vs disk). Everything depends
upon how your customers run your particular codes though.
On 17/11/14 19:42, Simon Sobisch wrote:
<snip>
>
> Applications with a size of more than some MB tend to start quite
> slow (reading from HDD and needing the space in RAM afterwards)
> while a modular application just needs some small reads to start up
> and loads whatever module is necessary when necessary.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=O0FM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----