[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET
From: |
Arend Bayer |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:03:07 +0200 (CEST) |
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Daniel Bump wrote:
>
> Teun wrote:
>
> > If all goes well, the 1-D board should be handled through
> > the macros in liberty.h only. The idea behind this patch
> > is that handling of the 1-D board can be tested by
> > introducing a BOARD_OFFSET in liberty.h. BOARD_OFFSET=0
> > gives the standard situation. BOARD_OFFSET>0 can be
> > used for testing.
> >
> > Currently Gnu Go crashes in the first reading test when
> > BOARD_OFFSET = 1.
> It seems dangerous to define PASS_MOVE to be other than
> zero. It could be hard to track down all the places where
> this is assumed.
>
> If don't try to define PASS_MOVE to be nonzero, the patch
> still produces crashes however, the first in reading test 5.
I'd guess that there are numerous places where PASS_MOVE == POS(-1, -1)
is assumed.
Arend
- [gnugo-devel] testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, Teun Burgers, 2002/04/28
- Re: [gnugo-devel] testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, Daniel Bump, 2002/04/28
- Re: [gnugo-devel] testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET,
Arend Bayer <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/04/28
- [gnugo-devel] Re: testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, Teun Burgers, 2002/04/29
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, bump, 2002/04/29
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, Heikki Levanto, 2002/04/29
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/04/29