[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] sgf output
From: |
Gunnar Farneback |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] sgf output |
Date: |
Thu, 02 May 2002 21:48:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (sparc-sun-solaris2.7) (with unibyte mode) |
Ben wrote:
> For an independent study course (in a scheme to get college credit for
> something go-related) I'm writing a program that will identify "good" joseki
> usage/fuseki patterns based on big libraries of sgf files. I'm planning on
> using gnugo to generate the libraries by feeding it sgf files with
> semi-randomly generated opening positions in them (--infile <my
> file> --score aftermath --outfile <gnogofile>.... but you guys already knew
> that). I started playing around with 3.0 about a week before 3.2 was
> released. When given those options the file 3.0 outputted had all the moves
> from the infile played in it followed by the moves gnugo generated. The
> file 3.2 generates, however, just has all the infile moves added (AB and AW
> in sgf, as apposed to played in sequence) and the gnugo moves go on from
> there.
The reason for the change is that I found the new format more suitable
for debugging scoring errors.
> I prefer 3.0's output but naturally would rather use 3.2. Is there
> any way to make 3.2 output like 3.0?
Only by modifying the function load_and_score_sgf_file() in
interface/play_solo.c.
> I looked in main.c but didn't see any relevant options... Also, is
> there any way to make gnugo not output the move choice labels and
> comments?
The same comment applies there.
/Gunnar
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [gnugo-devel] sgf output,
Gunnar Farneback <=