[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :)
From: |
Gunnar Farneback |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :) |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:29:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (sparc-sun-solaris2.7) (with unibyte mode) |
Nando wrote:
> > * Change 1, 2, 3 to KO_B, KO_A, WIN wherever those macros are
> > appropriate.
> > * Change any occurences of the form "3 - code" or "WIN - code" to
> > "REVERSE_RESULT(code)".
>
> No traces of the use of the literals 1 or 2 in place of KO_?.
> (cosmetic patch below)
I've added this patch to CVS. However, the patch was broken in a few
places like here:
> - SGFTRACE(best_move, WIN - best_other_tactic, "No good tactic.");
> + SGFTRACE(best_move, REVERSE_RESULT(best_other_tactic), "No good
> tactic.");
Presumably this is your mailer inserting extra linebreaks, thinking it
knows better than you how to format your text. Try to find a way to
disable this misfeature. I know that some other people on the list
have experienced similar problems so maybe someone can help if you
don't know how to do that.
/Gunnar
- [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :), Portela Fernand, 2002/09/09
- Re: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :), Portela Fernand, 2002/09/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :), Portela Fernand, 2002/09/10
- RE: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :), Portela Fernand, 2002/09/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :),
Gunnar Farneback <=
- RE: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :), Portela Fernand, 2002/09/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :), Portela Fernand, 2002/09/10
RE: [gnugo-devel] a patch from a newbie :), Portela Fernand, 2002/09/12