[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] question about twogtp.pl
From: |
Andrew Derrick Balsa |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] question about twogtp.pl |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 04:28:54 +0800 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
Hi,
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 23:43, Gunnar Farneback wrote:
[...]
> > The pass doesn't need to be passed on. The reason is that if your engine
> > receives two genmove commands with no intervening play, then clearly the
> > opponent has passed.
>
> Yes, it can be inferred, but that's no reason for the controller not
> to relay the pass moves as well. I consider it bad style to omit them.
I agree with Gunnar. In general a protocol definition should not have some
actions implied, and others explicit.
Regards,
--
Andrew D. Balsa
address@hidden
Re: [gnugo-devel] CB20 in conn.db, bump, 2002/10/22