[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [gnugo-devel] Owl tuning
From: |
Portela Fernand |
Subject: |
RE: [gnugo-devel] Owl tuning |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:40:36 +0100 |
Gunnar wrote:
> In this case I wouldn't say it would be well spent time to examine all
> those PASSes as long as you know that some of them pass thanks to your
> tuning.
Then it's ok I think. But ...
... I knew I'd need some help :
> This constraint looks strange. The second half gives O three
> consecutive moves which is usually not relevant. You don't mean
> !oplay_connect(*,?,a,b,c) ?
Oops. Right.
> I don't think you planned to count d twice.
Oops again.
> Shouldn't this be constrained on a specific goal string or the O
> stones being short on liberties?
Quite possibly. As it is now, it has no apparent nasty effects (i.e. no
negative effect on the regression tests), but I guess you're right that
it could be improved.
/nando