[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Bugfix
|
From: |
bump |
|
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Bugfix |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 15:39:27 -0800 |
Nando wrote:
> Apparently, yes. If I'm not mistaken, it causes following breakage :
>
> ./regress.sh . trevorb.tst
> 160 FAILED: Correct '1 ..*', got '0'
> ./regress.sh . trevor.tst
> 360 FAILED: Correct '(2|3) J9', got '1 E9'
>
> I prefer to know that we still have these problems.
This patch is now in the CVS.
Could you explain the last statement?
Dan
- [gnugo-devel] Bugfix, Portela Fernand, 2002/11/10
- RE: [gnugo-devel] Bugfix, Portela Fernand, 2002/11/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Bugfix,
bump <=
- [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Paul Pogonyshev, 2002/11/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, bump, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Paul Pogonyshev, 2002/11/12
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/11/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/30
RE: [gnugo-devel] Bugfix, Portela Fernand, 2002/11/11
RE: [gnugo-devel] bugfix, Portela Fernand, 2002/11/15