[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark? |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:10:28 -0800 |
> My best guess is that something goes wrong with the POS macro, like
> being picked up from somewhere in the system instead of the one we
> define in liberty.h. But I can't see how that could pass without the
> compiler complaining.
>
> Btw, I assume this is GNU Go 3.2. Is that correct?
So were there any compiler warnings?
Dan
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, Jim Koehler, 2002/11/13
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/14
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, bump, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, James Fulton Koehler, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, bump, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, James Fulton Koehler, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?,
bump <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, James Fulton Koehler, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, bump, 2002/11/15
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/11/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, James Fulton Koehler, 2002/11/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, Jim Koehler, 2002/11/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, Arend Bayer, 2002/11/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Go as SPEC benchmark?, James Fulton Koehler, 2002/11/18