Re: [gnugo-devel] owl tuning

[Arend Bayer]

Evan wrote:

> Two new owl patterns, together they solve 13x13:73.

> Index: patterns/owl_attackpats.db
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/gnugo/gnugo/patterns/owl_attackpats.db,v
> retrieving revision 1.66
> diff -u -r1.66 owl_attackpats.db
> --- patterns/owl_attackpats.db        12 Nov 2002 13:41:55 -0000      1.66
> +++ patterns/owl_attackpats.db        25 Nov 2002 14:41:50 -0000
> @@ -1702,6 +1702,25 @@
>  ;(owl_escape_value(b) > 0)
>
>
> +Pattern A424
> +#evand new pattern (3.1.13)
> +
> +O..X
> +o.*.
> +..x.
> +????
> +????
> +
> +:8,-,value(35)
> +
> +O..X
> +o.*a
> +..cb
> +????
> +????
> +
> +;(x_somewhere(c) && !oplay_attack_either(*,a,b,*,b))
> +;|| (!x_somewhere(c) && xplay_attack_either(c,*,a,b,*,b))

Did you mean
;|| (!x_somewhere(c) && !xplay_attack_either(c,*,a,b,*,b))
here?

I am not sure whether the constraing might be too expensive.


> +Pattern D1386
> +#evand new pattern (3.3.13)
> +
> +x.Oo keima connection to escape
> +x..O
> +x...
> +..*.
> +?...
> +????
> +
> +:8,E,value(65)
> +
> +#x.Oo
> +#x..O
> +#x...
> +#..*.
> +#a...
> +#bcde
> +
> +#;(owl_escape_value(a) > 0) || (owl_escape_value(b) > 0) ||
> +#;(owl_escape_value(c) > 0) || (owl_escape_value(d) > 0) ||
> +#;(owl_escape_value(d) > 0)
That's certainly     ^^^^ "e" here.

Did you run regression?

Arend