[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] new cache
From: |
Paul Pogonyshev |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] new cache |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 18:34:39 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.9 |
Wolfgang Manner wrote:
> i dont know how your linux box treats longlong. it still may be faster
> to compare by yourself word 1 and if it disagrees: break
> instead of comparing two longlong words
> wolfgang
i'm not sure about other architectures than x86, but the latter simply
cannot compare two 64-bit values in one operation. in other word, on
x86 `long long' is an abstraction - it is supported by compiler (gcc),
not processor itself. i'd guess that this is true for all 32-bit
processors.
so it doesn't matter much what we use: `long long' or two `int's. in
terms of machine code on x86 (all 32-bit architectures). but i would
suggest two `int's simply because it's absolutely portable.
Paul