[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd)
From: |
Dave Denholm |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd) |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 19:12:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (usg-unix-v) |
Gunnar Farnebäck <address@hidden> writes:
> I wrote (on August 3):
>> 2. GNU Go plays black, white mirrors
>>
>> Play tengen within some 10 to 20 moves.
>>
>> 4. GNU Go plays white, black starts at tengen and mirrors, komi < 0.
>>
>> Start a sequence to capture tengen within 10 to 20 moves.
>
> Implemented by the appended patch. As I intend this to go into 3.6 it
> would be good if someone can take a look to see that everything looks
> good.
>
I was wondering at the time, but never got round to writing...
why allow komi < 0 at all ?
I know it can be used on small boards when n stones is too few but n+1
stones is too many, but on an even game ?
Just doesn't seem worth adding extra complications to the code to
handle an uninteresting game option ?
dd
--
Dave Denholm <address@hidden> http://www.esmertec.com
- [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd), Arend Bayer, 2004/08/02
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd), Heikki Levanto, 2004/08/02
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd), Gunnar Farnebäck, 2004/08/02
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd), Gunnar Farnebäck, 2004/08/25
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd), aquarius, 2004/08/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd), Gunnar Farnebäck, 2004/08/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd), aquarius, 2004/08/28
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd), Gunnar Farnebäck, 2004/08/28
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd), aquarius, 2004/08/29
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd),
Dave Denholm <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd), Gunnar Farnebäck, 2004/08/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd), Dave Denholm, 2004/08/27
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd), Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/08/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Ranked Robot (fwd), Arend Bayer, 2004/08/27