[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch
From: |
Paul Pogonyshev |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:48:38 +0300 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
Arend wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
> > > > Unfortunately, I was wrong. Performance hit is around 10%: 6885
> > > > seconds CPU time against 6106 seconds. Timing may be not very
> > > > precise as I used the box during regression runs, but the main
> > > > picture is clear.
> > >
> > > Which CPU, compiler? I may try to run some tests myself.
> >
> > Athlon XP 2500+, GCC 3.2.
>
> On my Pentium M with GCC 3.4, I get about 7-8% performance penalty.
So what do people think about this? Is it too much?
Paul
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, (continued)
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Arend Bayer, 2005/04/20
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/04/21
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/04/24
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Arend Bayer, 2005/04/24
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/04/24
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Arend Bayer, 2005/04/24
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Arend Bayer, 2005/04/24
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/04/24
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Arend Bayer, 2005/04/24
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Arend Bayer, 2005/04/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch,
Paul Pogonyshev <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Trevor Morris, 2005/04/28
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Jens Yllman, 2005/04/28
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Marco Scheurer, 2005/04/28
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Arend Bayer, 2005/04/20
- Re: [gnugo-devel] multi-board branch, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/04/21