[www] branch stable updated (4491655d -> eb88cb2b)

[gnunet]

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

t3sserakt pushed a change to branch stable
in repository www.

    from 4491655d add anchor
     add 85c3924f Added L2O milestone 6 documentation
     add e9f32c74 Translated using Weblate (Spanish)
     add 8763afba Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git.gnunet.org/www
     add eb88cb2b fixed misplaced anchor to details page for milestone 6

No new revisions were added by this update.

Summary of changes:
 locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po |  6 +--
 template/l2o/index.html.j2        |  4 +-
 template/l2o/mile6.html.j2        | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 template/l2o/mile6.html.j2

diff --git a/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po 
b/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po
index 518f5fb2..ce12353d 100644
--- a/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po
+++ b/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/messages.po
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: PROJECT VERSION\n"
 "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: EMAIL@ADDRESS\n"
 "POT-Creation-Date: 2023-04-01 13:56+0200\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2022-08-17 22:14+0000\n"
-"Last-Translator: Lucía López <lulopezcabrera@gmail.com>\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: 2023-04-24 21:43+0000\n"
+"Last-Translator: José Huamán <princetomato@firemail.cc>\n"
 "Language-Team: Spanish <https://weblate.taler.net/projects/gnunet/website/es/";
 ">\n"
 "Language: es\n"
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ msgstr "Reportar problemas con el sitio web."
 
 #: common/navigation.j2.inc:10
 msgid "Skip to main content"
-msgstr ""
+msgstr "Saltar al contenido principal"
 
 #: common/navigation.j2.inc:33
 msgid "Home"
diff --git a/template/l2o/index.html.j2 b/template/l2o/index.html.j2
index a4ff4da9..bfc37f50 100644
--- a/template/l2o/index.html.j2
+++ b/template/l2o/index.html.j2
@@ -201,9 +201,9 @@ I will finish the project with a performance analysis to 
optimize the selection
        <h4>Deliverable</h4><br/>
        <p>
           {% trans %}
-               The test cases in the CI are measuring the performance gains. 
This measurement can be compared with the measurement of milestone 5. Again one 
outcome of this milestone will be a stable release.
+               The test cases in the CI are measuring the performance gains. 
This measurement can be compared with the measurement of milestone 5. Again one 
outcome of this milestone will be a stable release.<br/>
 
-      Documentation of the interpeer project analysis.
+      Documentation of the interpeer project analysis. More  <a 
href="mile6.html">Details</a>.
          {% endtrans %}
         </p><br/>
       </section>
diff --git a/template/l2o/mile6.html.j2 b/template/l2o/mile6.html.j2
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8a271dd4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/template/l2o/mile6.html.j2
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+ {% extends "common/base.j2" %}
+{% block body_content %}
+<main id="maincontent">
+<article class="container">
+
+  <header>
+    <h1>{{ _("NGI Assure project: Layer-2-Overlay") }}</h1>
+  </header>
+
+  <div class="row">
+    <div class="col-2 d-none d-lg-block"><!-- for large viewports show menu 
for better orientation -->
+      <nav class="nav subnav position-fixed flex-column border-right" 
style="position:fixed">
+      <a class="nav-link" href="index.html#idea">{{ _("Project main page") 
}}</a>
+      </nav>
+    </div>
+    <div class="col">
+
+      <h2>Implementation details milestone 6</h2><br/>
+
+      <section>
+        <h4>{{ _("TNG Service") }}</h4><br/>
+        <p>
+          {% trans %}
+         <ul>
+               <li>Introduced frags_in_flight flag. With this flag we check if 
fragments of a PendingMessage are being send right now, to not resend single 
fragments, but the PendingMessage at once.</li>
+               <li>The time to wait for resending a PendingMessage - which was 
fragmented - is calculated, depending on the number of fragments present, and 
how much of the PendingMessage was already fragmented.</li>
+               <li>ValidationState now contains the addres prefix of the 
address being validated, because we have to check which communicator gave us 
the validation response.</li>
+               <li>Handling flow control takes used window size into account, 
together with data loss.</li>
+               <li>We do not update queue performance if PendingMessage was 
resend.</li>
+               <li>Changed test case to except 0.5% packet loss.</li>
+               <li>Removed misplaced sending of an acknowlegement in udp 
communicator.</li>
+               <li>GNUNET_SERVICE_client_continue was misplaced after 
receiving CORE Ack, blocking the service.</li>
+               <li>Fixed bug when checking, if fragment sub tree is done.</li>
+               <li>Fixed bug in calculation of delay for 
PendingAcknowledgement.</li>
+               <li>Fixed bug in calculation of subtree fragment message 
size.</li>
+               <li>Fixed bug that additional queues for the same communicator 
inherit the validity period.</li>
+               <li>Fixed logic bug when searching for QueueEntry matching 
acknowledgement.</li>
+               <li>Fixed misplaced increase of queue length.</li>
+         </ul>
+         {% endtrans %}
+        </p>
+      </section>
+
+      <section>
+       <h4>{{ _("Configuration") }}</h4>
+        <p>
+          {% trans %}
+         <table width="100%">
+                <tr>
+                       <td width="60%" style="vertical-align: 
top;">src/transport/test_transport_simple_send_performance_topo.conf</td><td 
width="40%" style="vertical-align: top;">Changed configuration to use TCP and 
UDP together.</td>
+               </tr>
+         </table>
+         {% endtrans %}
+       </p>
+      </section>
+      <section>
+        <h4>{{ _("Performance Measurement") }}</h4>
+        <p>
+          {% trans %}
+         The performance increased to 160 MByte/s for packet size of 65000 
bytes using TCP and UDP together.
+
+         There are still possibilities to increase performance documented as 
TODOs in the source code.
+         {% endtrans %}
+        </p>
+      </section>
+      <section>
+        <h4>{{ _("Synergie with Interpeer Channeler project.") }}</h4>
+        <p>
+          {% trans %}
+         The Interpeer library Channeler and the L2O project have some goals 
in common. These include independence of the transmission protocol used, 
congestion control, reliability. Other goals of the Channeler project are not 
goals of the L2O project, but are already implemented or planned for other 
layers of GNUnet, such as multiplexing and ordered delivery of packages. There 
are also goals of the L2O project that are not goals of the Channeler project, 
such as metadata protection and ident [...]
+
+         In conclusion, both projects can benefit from each other. At this 
point in time, it is still too early to tackle this concretely.
+         {% endtrans %}
+        </p>
+      </section>
+    </div>
+  </div>
+
+</article>
+{% endblock body_content %}

-- 
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
gnunet@gnunet.org.