Re: Patch for unicode support on Win32 in GNUstep base

[Sungjin Chun]

Hi,

As far as I know, if we use UTF-8, then it could be represented as 
const char *, isn't it?
Does windows uses UTF-16 for representation? I'm using Korean version 
of Windows
but I do not have problem with char * for file name representation if I 
use UTF-8 encoding.
But this is not proved :-)

On Aug 4, 2004, at 8:14 PM, Roland Schwingel wrote:

> Hi....
>
> Alexander Malmberg wrote:
> > The current methods for converting paths to/from the fs 
> representation
> > are supposed to convert to whatever the system wants, so if the wide
> > character strings are what the system wants, that's what they should
> > convert to/from (and if this breaks other methods that assume that 
> the
> > fs representation can be used as a c string, those methods should be
> > fixed).
> >
> > Adding a second set of methods for a specific system seems wrong, and
> > goes against the entire purpose of hiding the conversions behind a
> > single, cross-platform interface. Why not fix the first set?
>
> I think you are talking about fileSystemRepresentationWithPath: and
> wFileSystemRepresentationWithPath:
>
> Well... The reason for adding the additional 'w' method for
> fileSystemRepresentationWithPath: is that 
> fileSystemRepresentationWithPath:
> is defined to return const char* in the OpenStep spec. If your path 
> contains
> unicode chars you cannot convert them to const char*. You need to 
> convert
> them to const unichar* to be later on able to work with it.
>
> Having just one method (fileSystemRepresentationWithPath:)would mean to
> change it to return either const unichar* instead of const char* or
> NSString. Both would break the OpenStep spec and compatibililty.
>
> So we introduced (yet only internally used in GNUstep base and only 
> for windows)
> wFileSystemRepresentation: to be able to handle paths containing 
> unicode characters
> on windows.
>
> Roland
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep