gnustep-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sync.m


From: icicle
Subject: Re: sync.m
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:03:58 +0100
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.4)

Hi!

looks like it is not fixed :( Richard ported the code over to the
ObjectiveC2 framework immediately, but it still does not work. Now I
get "Uncaught exception NSInvalidArgumentException, reason:
(null)(class) does not recognize instance". As "instance" is the class
method which creates the singleton now something else seems to go wrong.

Thanks
TOM

Zitat von David Chisnall <address@hidden>:

I've now fixed this case in libobjc2.  Unfortunately, someone decided
to 'helpfully' reindent the version of ObjectiveC2.framework in
GNUstep, which means that diffs from libobjc2 no longer cleanly apply
in ObjectiveC2 (nor to diffs against the original version in Étoilé
svn), so whoever did that gets to volunteer to back-port the changes.

On 27 Feb 2010, at 17:40, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:

You are probably in a better position than anyone else to be aware
of precisely what parts of ObjectiveC-2 are most efficient or
inefficient, and how they compare to the traditional ways of doing
things.  Have you considered producing a paper describing those
differences?  If we had them quantified we would have a really good
guide for people to know when to use new features and when to avoid
them (and when it really doesn't matter).


Well, I did write a book that describes them...

@synchronized is basically impossible to implement efficiently.  It's
a stupid feature added to make life easier for Java programmers who
are too lazy to think when they learn a new language.  There are
basically three ways you can do it:

1) Allocate a pthread_mutex_t with every object

Pros: Fast, simple
Cons: Wastes at least one word of memory for every object, including
the 99.9% that are never used as arguments to @synchronized().

2) Have a shadow data structure mapping objects to locks.

Pros: Doesn't waste much memory.
Cons: Extra locking on the shadow structure needed, extra code needed
to remove locks when they are no longer needed, overhead performing
the lookup.

3) Add a hidden class between the object and its real class which
stores the lock.

Pros: Relatively simple and non-invasive.
Cons: Needs an extra class structure for every locked object.

libobjc2 / ObjectiveC2.framework use option 3.  We use
objc_allocateClassPair(), which doesn't work for creating just a new
metaclass (although we fail slightly more gracefully than Apple's
version, which just returns a pointer to a random address).  I've now
added a special case to libobjc2 and a non-portable runtime function
for allocating just a new metaclass.

In all cases, this pattern will be much faster:

[nslock lock];
@try {
        // do stuff
} @finally {
        [nslock unlock];
}

It's also worth remembering that @synchronized uses a recursive
mutex, which, on most platforms, is slower than the non-recursive
form used by NSLock.  Unless you actually need the recursive
behaviour, don't use it.

@synchronized is a horrendous language feature, because it looks just
like the Java keyword, but has almost the exact opposite performance
characteristics.

David

-- Sent from my Difference Engine











reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]