[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?
From: |
Werner Koch |
Subject: |
Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls? |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:51:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) |
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:38, address@hidden said:
> Anyway, I think we have established a long list of GPLv2-only projects
> that use GnuTLS that needs to be studied more closely before we make any
Quite a long list on my Sid box: Alone 1534 packages list a dependency
to libgtk2.0 and that in turn to gnutls. It will be huge task to
check them all for GPLv2(only) code.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Linux-Kongress 2008 + Hamburg + October 7-10 + www.linux-kongress.org
Die Gedanken sind frei. Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz.
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, (continued)
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Alvaro Lopez Ortega, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Alvaro Lopez Ortega, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?,
Werner Koch <=
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/10