[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !
From: |
Biagio Lucini |
Subject: |
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted ! |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:55:17 +0000 (GMT) |
On 29 Jan 2003, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Op wo 29-01-2003, om 16:04 schreef Biagio Lucini:
>
> I just mean to say that it may be a better plan not to rely on NPTL (as
> good as it may be, it sure looks good) because most people just don't
> have it yet and probably won't have it for a while either. Therefore,
> to say that all GNU software will go there "in the near future" just
> seems a little too optimistic to me.
>
> It is an interesting discussion point which library we should target
> first. IMO it should be one that most people in our "target audience"
> have at their disposal. I guess that would be LinuxThreads, and since
> NPTL is mostly backward compatible with that library, I would like to
> see the first low-level runtime should be based on LinuxThreads.
>
I'm perfectly fine with LinuxThreads and I realize that NPTL is a bit new,
but the problem is that gcc is not suppose to run just on Linux, so a
general threading model would be better.
Any thoughts?
Biagio
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, (continued)
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Biagio Lucini, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Lars Segerlund, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Biagio Lucini, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Steven Bosscher, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Lars Segerlund, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Diego Novillo, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Steven Bosscher, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Biagio Lucini, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Steven Bosscher, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Lars Segerlund, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !,
Biagio Lucini <=
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Lars Segerlund, 2003/01/29
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/01/29
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Steven Bosscher, 2003/01/29
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Diego Novillo, 2003/01/29
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/01/29
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/01/29
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Steven Bosscher, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Diego Novillo, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !, Steven Bosscher, 2003/01/29