[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking
From: |
Scott Robert Ladd |
Subject: |
RE: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:41:35 -0500 |
Steven Bosscher wrote:
> I suppose that work depends on what Scott finds out though...
Ugh. I'd getmore work done if I didn't have clients! ;) A good customer
needed something for a road trip, so I've been buried in Java for the last
48 hours.
I'm finishing up my OpenMP analysis right as we speak. I'll get it codified
and posted tonight.
There is certainly a common core; the differences lie in subtlties; even C
and C++ differ a bit in what needs to happen for the same OpenMP construct.
Overall, though, I think there's a definite set we can use as our core.
I'm working from the OpenMP 2.0 docs; I assume we are not concerned with
earlier versions?
..Scott
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking, (continued)
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/06
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking, Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking, Biagio Lucini, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking, Diego Novillo, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking, Biagio Lucini, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking, Diego Novillo, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking, Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking, Biagio Lucini, 2003/02/07
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/07
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking,
Scott Robert Ladd <=
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/07
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Hacking, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/07