[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the Cfront end
From: |
Steven Bosscher |
Subject: |
RE: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the Cfront end |
Date: |
08 Feb 2003 14:59:14 +0100 |
Op za 08-02-2003, om 14:54 schreef Scott Robert Ladd:
> Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > It's also very likely that people are more interested in OpenMP for C++
> > than for C. I've never seen any serious numerical code in C, and lots
> > of them in C++.
>
> That could very well change. C99 focused on numerical extensions; it is, in
> some ways, superior to Fortran 95 for floating-point work. Many C99
> extensions are incompatible with C++; see David Tribble's excellent site for
> more detail:
I thought a big part of that was in IEEE arithmetic support, which GCC
does not support (there are non-IEEE targets in GCC). F95 has IEEE as
an extension and a reworked version of it is part of F2k.
Greetz
Steven
- [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end, (continued)
[Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/07
RE: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/07
[Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end, Neil Booth, 2003/02/07
RE: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/08
[Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end, Zack Weinberg, 2003/02/11