[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gomp-discuss] The tree nodes ...
From: |
Lars Segerlund |
Subject: |
[Gomp-discuss] The tree nodes ... |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:05:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021226 Debian/1.2.1-9 |
I have been reading Diego's paper this weekend, and It seem's like
just the starting point we need, however we might want another set of
tree nodes, as there are a couple of explicit attributes which openMP
specifies which was not covered in their work.
( such as ATOMIC variables )
Is there any toughts on the primitives needed, and how we should go
about specifying the implementation we aim for ?
I think that as soon as we have the tree form specified we can start
work on all different parts, the parsing into the tree's, the
implementation of the same, and the integration into the optimization
and code generation routines.
( also want to vent my opinion that we should make the distinction
between section running on the same machine and sections slated to
target another cpu ).
As for the discussion about HPC gnu initiative, I think that we can
postpone that and rather work with the existing standards, such as
Threading libraries and open MPI or PVM implementations, ( the last two
in the future ), but what it actualizes is the need not to restrict
ourself to much.
In other words, what do we do now ?
/ Lars Segerlund.
- [Gomp-discuss] The tree nodes ...,
Lars Segerlund <=