[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores ..
From: |
Biagio Lucini |
Subject: |
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .. |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:26:57 +0000 (GMT) |
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Lars Segerlund wrote:
>
> I am trying to write some semaphores for the fork/join of threads, (
> more specificly the join ), and I have the decision on using primitives
> from POSIX threads, or an asm macro using native instructions in the
> target cpu to do atomic updates.
>
> What is the opinion on this among you people ?
>
[...]
My vote is for posix, for the reason you explain.
> It's just the overhead of the join and such that concerns me.
>
In a well-structured parallel program there must be as few as possible
fork/join. In an hyperideal case, you should just fork close to the
beginning and join right before the end. So I'm not concerned about this
overhead: part of it is down to the programer, the rest should be
negligible anyway.
Cheers
Biagio
- [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/19
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/19
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Pop Sébastian, 2003/02/19
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/19
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/19
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/19
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/19
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/19
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores ..,
Biagio Lucini <=
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/19
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/19
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/19
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/19
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/19
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/19