gpsd-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: altitude validity


From: Gary E. Miller
Subject: Re: altitude validity
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:23:14 -0800

Yo Greg!

On Mon, 03 Feb 2020 19:18:35 -0500
Greg Troxel <address@hidden> wrote:

> Thanks.  This is about direwolf, a software modem for amateur radio
> packet.

Oh, more ham  stuff.  Seems to be popular again.  Maybe even a
Maindenhead user?

> So this notion of NaN makes a lot of sense, but it was unobvious from
> reading gps.h and from reading the libgps man page.

No one gets NaN the first few times.  Libraries constantly get it wrong.
I have seen sevaral bug reports on major languages in the last week
about NaN misunderstanding.

> I am also unclear on that ALTITUDE_SET means, if one is supposed to
> check against NaN.

It means nothing.  Note that is it undocumented.  Ignore it.  I would
remove it, but there is so much legacy code that all I can do is
deprecate it.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
        address@hidden  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

            Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin

Attachment: pgpQIT0HKen80.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]