[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118 |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:50:40 -0800 |
Yo Sanjeev!
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:47:51 +0800
Sanjeev Gupta <ghane0@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not sure what desired behaviour should be.
Ditto.
> If I specify that manbuild=yes , and asciidoctor is not available, I
> get a warning, but the build completes (as does the install).
>
> This is surprising. Perhaps if manbuild=yes , the warning should be a
> failure?
I don't think it has ever been an error. Since the default is
manbuild=yes, it would be annoying to hard fail.
Easy to change if anyone feels strongly about it.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgp0QLSWshtU7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/01/25
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Sanjeev Gupta, 2021/01/25
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Sanjeev Gupta, 2021/01/27
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118,
Gary E. Miller <=
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/01/28
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/01/28
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/01/28
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/01/28
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Sanjeev Gupta, 2021/01/30
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/01/31
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Hal Murray, 2021/01/31