[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gpsd-users] ✘ZED-F9T vs. NEO-M8T
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
[gpsd-users] ✘ZED-F9T vs. NEO-M8T |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Aug 2019 11:33:39 -0700 |
Yo All!
I was recently asked how the ZED-F9T compares to the NEO-M8T. So
I pulled up some 12h scatter plots. See attached. The plots
are interesting.
Notice that the overall, 12 hour, results are very similar. A CEP(95%)
os about 4 meters. The medium term (10 minute) wandering also seems
about the same.
The big improvement of the F9T seems to be in the high frequency
(seconds) jitter. It seems the L1/L2, and multiple GNSS, signals
really damp down the short term jitter. You can see this with cgps
as a more stable lat/lon.
Neither is good enough to put your car in the lane, no matter how
good your maps are.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
address@hidden Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
roof-f9t-12h.png
Description: PNG image
roof-m8t-12h.png
Description: PNG image
pgp965PD34obi.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [gpsd-users] ✘ZED-F9T vs. NEO-M8T,
Gary E. Miller <=