[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM
|
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
|
Subject: |
Re: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM |
|
Date: |
Sun, 8 Mar 2020 15:43:29 -0700 |
Yo Nick!
On Sun, 08 Mar 2020 03:33:17 +0000
"Nick Burkitt" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Gary.
>
> Sorry, I'm having a little trouble keeping up.
>
> remote refid st t when poll reach delay
> offset jitter
> SHM(0) .GPS. 0 l 8 64 377 0.0000
> -65.3223 1.4824
> SHM(1) .PPS. 0 l - 8 0 0.0000
> 0.0000 0.0019
>
> SHM(0) shows a 1.4 millisecond, not microsecond, jitter.
Yeah, you are right. Give it some time. And remember, last you sent
an ntp.conf, did you not have noselect on SHM(0?
> SHM(1) has a reach of 0, so no information.
Correct, gpsd is not sending a SHM(1) when started with:
gpsd -n /dev/pps0 /dev/ttyACMx
> Where does SHM(2) come into the picture?
As I said, it is the GPS serial time. Not the order of your
command line. /dev/pps0 is first, so it shows as SHM(0). /dev/pps0
has no secondary time, so SHM(1) is unused. /dev/ttyACMx is second
on the command line, thus becomes SHM(2). It has no secondary (PP@) so
SHM(3) is unused.
> Here's what ntpshmmon says.
>
> root@MPM-4006:~# ntpshmmon -n20
> ntpshmmon: version 3.20
> # Name Seen@ Clock Real
> L Prc
> sample NTP2 1583636734.047149990 1583636733.998375333
> 1583636734.000000000 0 -20
> sample NTP0 1583636734.080901499 1583636734.077254944
> 1583636733.999650744 0 -20
Yup. NTP2 is PGS, and NTP0 is PPS.
Be sure to noselect SHM(2) and prefer SHM(0)
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
address@hidden Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpxZ28PJrngH.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, (continued)
- Re[2]: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Nick Burkitt, 2020/03/06
- Re[3]: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Nick Burkitt, 2020/03/07
- Re: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Gary E. Miller, 2020/03/07
- Re[2]: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Nick Burkitt, 2020/03/07
- Re: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Gary E. Miller, 2020/03/07
- Re: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Gary E. Miller, 2020/03/07
- Re[2]: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Nick Burkitt, 2020/03/07
- Re: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM,
Gary E. Miller <=
- Re[2]: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Nick Burkitt, 2020/03/09
- Re: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Greg Troxel, 2020/03/09
- Re[2]: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Nick Burkitt, 2020/03/09
- Re[3]: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Nick Burkitt, 2020/03/09
- Re: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Gary E. Miller, 2020/03/09
- Re[2]: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Nick Burkitt, 2020/03/09
- Re: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Greg Troxel, 2020/03/09
- Re[2]: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Nick Burkitt, 2020/03/09
- Re: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Gary E. Miller, 2020/03/09
- Re[2]: NTPsec reports excessive jitter from GPSD/KPPS SHM, Nick Burkitt, 2020/03/09