[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[groff] 11/12: doc/groff.texi (Debugging): Discuss `fl` more.
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
[groff] 11/12: doc/groff.texi (Debugging): Discuss `fl` more. |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Feb 2024 00:04:04 -0500 (EST) |
gbranden pushed a commit to branch master
in repository groff.
commit d975d283a4d8382ea437a31aeb92b0f6c70cb22a
Author: G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Fri Feb 2 19:39:49 2024 -0600
doc/groff.texi (Debugging): Discuss `fl` more.
---
doc/groff.texi | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/groff.texi b/doc/groff.texi
index 5ff964977..fef257741 100644
--- a/doc/groff.texi
+++ b/doc/groff.texi
@@ -17129,6 +17129,19 @@ Break the line and flush any pending output line
immediately. The
effect is the same as the @code{br} request unless the no-break control
character is used; @samp{'br} does nothing, whereas @samp{'fl} writes
the pending output line without further updating the drawing position.
+However, the @emph{reported} horizontal drawing position is still
+reckoned from the start of the input line.
+
+@Example
+foo bar \n(hp
+foo bar \c
+'fl
+\n(hp
+ @result{} foo bar 192 foo bar 0
+@endExample
+
+The timing of a flush is most easily perceived in GNU @command{troff}'s
+device-independent output.
Historically, @code{fl} was used with @code{rd} to produce interactive
@command{nroff} documents. GNU @command{troff} does not easily support
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [groff] 11/12: doc/groff.texi (Debugging): Discuss `fl` more.,
G. Branden Robinson <=