[Groff] Yet another bug in -mm macros ?

[Thomas Baruchel]

Brest, le mercredi 18 avril

Hi, the second time I'm talking about the -mm macros (not because I don't
like -mm macros, but because it's the first time I use them; last year for
the same big report (80 pages) I used -ms that I know for a long time, but
I decided to use -mm this year and I'm quite happy of the choice).
But...
I use footnotes, and I found myself in this situation:


Copy of the second half of a page:

    |  .                             |
    |  .                             |
    |  .                             |
    | This is the text of my re-     |
    | port.                          |
    | Now I use a footnote on this   |
    | line (1), and another one      |
    | on this line (2).              |
    | -------------------            |
    | (1) First foot note, just      |
    |     enough place for it.       |
    +--------------------------------+

Where is the second foot note? On the next page, just above the first footnote
of the following page:

   (2) Footnote of the previous page
   (1) First footnote of the current page
   (2) Second footnote of the current page
   
I'd like rather groff to put a blank line in this way:

    | Now I use a footnote on this   |
    | line (1), and another one      |
    |    < blank line >              |
    | -------------------            |
    
and put the last line of text (and the note) on the next page (not only the
footnote without the text). Is there a way to force this ? Is this a bug ?


-- 
        ,--._
      .'o    `-.__
      |     (~'   ~~--.__
      ),-.'  `. '' ,,    ~`-.
     //   \    ( ,,  ,, ''   `)    Thomas Baruchel
    //     `.   `. ,,  ,,'' .'
   //        ~.   `._,,   ,'  <address@hidden>
   '   _tb_    `-.___.,-~'
                   \  \                 Brest
                  _/ _/