[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise
From: |
Clarke Echols |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:13:58 -0600 |
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > .de xx
> > hello world!
> > ..
> > abc
> > \fB.xx\fP
> > def
> >
> > Quick answer: `abc' in plain, `hello world! def' in bold. Note,
> > `def' is in bold too!
>
> This is not only bizarre, this is pathologic :-) Again, may I ask to
> test this with AT&T troff?
>
> Werner
I may have my AT&T manuals buried around here somewhere, but I don't
have time to look for them right now. However, I will argue that if
the dot is not the first character in the line, before ANY other
character, it should not be interpreted as a control device. If you
want to print the contents of macro "xx" in bold you should use
something similar to
.de xx
Hello world!
..
abc \fB
.xx
\fP
to get:
abc Hello World
If you want to suppress whitespace after the \fB, you should use in
line 4:
abc \fB\c
.xx
etc.
But anytime the line
\fB.xx\fP
appears anywhere, it should ALWAYS print ".xx" in bold -- no exceptions.
I am not aware of any AT&T manual that allows an exception.
>From the Eroff manual (Eroff 3.0), chapter 4 page 2:
"Control lines BEGIN with a control character, normally a period (".")
or an acute accent ("'"), followed by a 1- or 2-character command
name, collectively called a _request_." (emphasis mine)
I find no text indicating that there are any exceptions to that rule.
Clarke
- Re: [Groff] An observation on .writem, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] An observation on .writem, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/08/31
- [Groff] .cf and .trf, Sigfrid Lundberg, Netlab, 2001/08/30
- RE: [Groff] .cf and .trf, Ted Harding, 2001/08/30
- RE: [Groff] .cf and .trf, Sigfrid Lundberg, Netlab, 2001/08/30
- RE: [Groff] .cf and .trf, Ted Harding, 2001/08/30
- RE: [Groff] .cf and .trf, Sigfrid Lundberg, Netlab, 2001/08/31
- RE: [Groff] #ifdef WIDOW_CONTROL???, Ted Harding, 2001/08/30
- RE: [Groff] #ifdef WIDOW_CONTROL???, Sigfrid Lundberg, Netlab, 2001/08/30
- RE: [Groff] #ifdef WIDOW_CONTROL???, Ted Harding, 2001/08/30
- RE: [Groff] #ifdef WIDOW_CONTROL???, Sigfrid Lundberg, Netlab, 2001/08/31
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise,
Clarke Echols <=
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Andrew Koenig, 2001/08/27
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/08/28
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Ted Harding, 2001/08/28
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Clarke Echols, 2001/08/26
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/08/27
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Clarke Echols, 2001/08/27
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/08/28