[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] me docs
From: |
Bernd Warken |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] me docs |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:18:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 09:13:26AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> I've found a disadvantage: What if the user wants to use a different
> implementation of the me macro package? For example, I've heard that
> the UNIX mm macros are still better than groff's version. I can
> imagine that people rename one of the packages to have both available.
> This avoids fiddling with the -M option.
Namespaces could handle this situation.
I wrote the Gutenberg tmac using namespaces.
As it is quite small it's good to test the concept.
But it still needs a bit of thinking.
Bernd Warken
- [Groff] me docs, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/27
- Re: [Groff] me docs, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/28
- Re: [Groff] me docs, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/29
- Re: [Groff] me docs, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/30
- Re: [Groff] me docs, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/30